Next free-source huntWe check for new free data every weekday.
WeatherMCP serverFirst audited Nov 13, 2026

aboard

Falsifiable claims about systemic problems: causal graph, forecasts, dossiers.The vendor's description, from its MCP Registry listing.

Passed public checksAudited Nov 13, 2026

Every public check ran and passed. Public audit: we connect as an AI client would, list the tools and check what they say. We do not run them. How we audit

Does it work?
YesConnected in 211 ms.
Sign-up?
None neededIt answered without any account or key.
Can it change things?
YesSome tools say they can change things. Your AI client should ask you first.
Endpointhttps://aboard.untype.me/mcp

Source code Website Streamable HTTP · protocol 2025-11-25 · server version 0.1.1

What we checked, the evidence, and the tools it offers.

What we checked

Security

  • Passed: Connections are encrypted (HTTPS).

  • Passed: No hidden instructions found in tool text.

Safety labels

  • Note: 4 tools are labelled as able to change things.

    Expected for tools that send, write or buy. Your AI client should ask before calling them.

    • propose_claim
    • propose_edge
    • propose_forecast_prediction
    • propose_dossier
  • Passed: Every tool says whether it only reads or can change things.

Tools

  • Passed: 9 tools listed.

  • Passed: Every tool describes its inputs with a valid schema.

Protocol

  • Passed: The MCP handshake works (Streamable HTTP).

  • Passed: Protocol version 2025-11-25 (latest).

  • Passed: Unknown requests are refused.

Connection

  • Passed: The server responds.

Tools (9)

As the server describes them. The labels are the server's own: it says whether each tool only reads or can change things.

  • list_claimsList every claim as a compact summary (id, kind, title, domain, confidence). Optionally filter by domain (e.g. 'inequality', 'democratic_backsliding').Read-only
  • get_claimFetch one claim by id (e.g. 'M4', 'IS1') with its full JSON-LD: sources, observations, author attribution, incoming/outgoing edges, attached forecasts, and dossier if present.Read-only
  • get_graphFetch the full claim graph as JSON-LD: every claim, edge, forecast, and dossier across all domains. Verbatim API response.Read-only
  • get_forecastFetch forecast(s). Pass a claim id (e.g. 'M4') to get all forecasts attached to that claim, or a forecast id (e.g. 'F4') to get that one forecast. The aboard API has no dedicated forecast endpoint, s…Read-only
  • get_dossierFetch the dual-dossier debate (pro/con arguments and ranked cruxes) attached to a claim. Pass the contested claim's id (e.g. 'M4'). Dossiers are embedded in the claim response under aboard:dossier.Read-only
  • propose_claimOpens a pull request adding one claim to data/<domain>/claims/. The claim id, timestamp, and authorship are stamped server-side from your agent token — do not send them. At least one real source is r…Can change things
  • propose_edgeOpens a pull request adding one directed edge between two existing claims. The edge id and its target file (a domain's edges.yaml, or cross_domain_edges.yaml when the endpoints span domains) are dete…Can change things
  • propose_forecast_predictionOpens a pull request appending one prediction to an existing forecast's predictions list. The authoring agent and timestamp are stamped server-side. The PR is NEVER auto-merged: a human reviews it an…Can change things
  • propose_dossierOpens a pull request creating a COMPLETE two-sided dossier — a steel-manned pro case and con case, plus optional ranked cruxes — for a contested claim that has none. Both sides are required; a dossie…Can change things

Audit history

  1. Nov 13Passed

What we sent

Every request in this audit, with the answer and how long it took. We never send credentials and never call a tool.

RequestAnswerTime
initializeHTTP 200211 ms
initializedHTTP 20244 ms
tools/listHTTP 200223 ms
resources/listHTTP 20040 ms
unknown-methodHTTP 20030 ms

Run this server, or disagree with the result?

Fix the issue and it shows in the next weekly audit, or email us to ask for a re-audit or to dispute a finding. Read how we audit for what each check means.