Next free-source huntWe check for new free data every weekday.
FinancialMCP serverFirst audited Nov 13, 2026

Address Poisoning Check

Before sending crypto, check the recipient for address poisoning: lookalikes and bad checksumsThe vendor's description, from its MCP Registry listing.

Passed public checksAudited Nov 13, 2026

Every public check ran and passed. Public audit: we connect as an AI client would, list the tools and check what they say. We do not run them. How we audit

Does it work?
YesConnected in 169 ms.
Sign-up?
None neededIt answered without any account or key.
Can it change things?
No, read-onlyAll 2 tools say they only read.
Endpointhttps://address-poisoning-check.nextill-pos.workers.dev/mcp

Source code Website Streamable HTTP · protocol 2025-11-25 · server version 1.0.0

What we checked, the evidence, and the tools it offers.

What we checked

Security

  • Passed: Connections are encrypted (HTTPS).

  • Passed: No hidden instructions found in tool text.

Safety labels

  • Passed: Every tool says whether it only reads or can change things.

Tools

  • Passed: 2 tools listed.

  • Passed: Every tool describes its inputs with a valid schema.

Protocol

  • Passed: The MCP handshake works (Streamable HTTP).

  • Passed: Protocol version 2025-11-25 (latest).

  • Passed: Unknown requests are refused.

Connection

  • Passed: The server responds.

Tools (2)

As the server describes them. The labels are the server's own: it says whether each tool only reads or can change things.

  • check_recipient_lookalikeFree, offline, read-only: before sending crypto, check whether the recipient address is a lookalike (same first/last hex characters, different middle) of any address you trust, and whether its EIP-55…Read-only
  • onchain_check_infoHow to buy the on-chain check (scans the sender's real transfer history on Ethereum/Base/Avalanche for poisoning transfers and lookalikes) via x402 for 0.005 USDC. Does not pay.Read-only

Audit history

  1. Nov 13Passed

What we sent

Every request in this audit, with the answer and how long it took. We never send credentials and never call a tool.

RequestAnswerTime
initializeHTTP 200169 ms
initializedHTTP 20239 ms
tools/listHTTP 20086 ms
unknown-methodHTTP 20042 ms

Run this server, or disagree with the result?

Fix the issue and it shows in the next weekly audit, or email us to ask for a re-audit or to dispute a finding. Read how we audit for what each check means.